スポンサード リンク

2015年01月16日

英語(英文)レポートの書き方例6(700語) We Should Give Human Right for Some Robot

このサイトの中では一番長い英語の文で大作になっていますね。題の内容はロボットに人権を与えるべきかという、なんとも書きづらいものですが、イントロダクションからはいり、シーシスステートメントがあり、ボディーがある。そして、コンクリュージョン、コンクリューディングセンテンスがしっかりとしている。英文の書き方の基礎のまとめの例としては、なかなかな物ではないでしょうか?

We Should Give Human Right for Some Robot
We made a lot of robot until now. For example, Runba is for cleaning, Aibo is a dog robot to be communicable with people, and Ashimo is Human Robot walking by two feet. In the future, we may keep making many kind of robot. We can have many image of the many kind of robot in the future. Maybe some of you imagine some Robot which makes us happy, like Doraemon (Fujiko, 1974) or Ararechan (Toriyama, 1980). Others may imagine some robot for war or protect people. Now, we can divide the type of robot. One is the robot which has totally same or surpass emotions and intelligence with humans, and the other is not. If we make such a kind of former Robot, should we give human right for the robot? Some people say “NO” because of afraid to come up against the robot like “Terminator” (Gale & James, 1984). But I am against this opinion and insist that people should give human rights for the robot because the robot can duties, the robot has a parent, and it is also for human if the robot have same intelligence and feelings with human.
People have many duties and do these, and we have human rights, so if the robot having totally same or surpass emotions and intelligence with humans also can do that, the robot must have human rights. We need to do a lot of thing to live, and a governments and societies require these. For example, we have to pay much tax, to work after certain ages and to make our children to study. In addition, we have to obey many laws to have a punishment. Over such a many things, we can get our human rights. Therefore, it is normal for the robot to get human right if robot can do all duties.
The robot is made by human, so in other words, the human is a parent of that robot. Therefore, we have to protect robot to protect the creator. Most creators have big pride to the object. Especially creators who made a robot who has feeling do not want the robot to be wounded. According to Christensen from Georgia Tech University (Salamander, 2009), he insist it is hard to understand that we must not kick the real dog, but it is all right to kick robot one. I exactly agree his opinion and all the more about the robot who have a feeling and a creator.
To give the right is also for general human because without rules we might sometimes confuse how we should treat or communicate with the robot. Ethic and morals have individual differences. This topic is really depends on these. Without rule, we can expect many kind of attitude, so we should make some rule. Christensen (Salamander, 2009) said that some people cannot decide what is right or not to robot, so we have make rule for them. He also said that we have to make sure what is right or wrong to robots, and for it we need rules. Making rules about robot is for humans as well as the robots.
In conclusion, we have to give human rights for the robot who have same or surpass intelligence and feelings with human. We made many kind of robot until now, and we also have images of future robots in the comic or movie. Some images for robot are good like Doraemon or Ararechan, but others are not like Terminator.  We can divide the type of robots. Some are the robots which has totally same or surpass emotions and intelligence with humans, and the others are not. Some people are against giving human right for such a kind of robot because they afraid that the robots go against people. But I am against that opinion because of three reasons: first reason is such a kind of robots can do the duties which people should do. Second, to protect the robot is to protect the dignity of creator. Third, without rules, some people do not know how we should treat the robot. For these reasons, I insist the robot should have human rights if the robots have same or surpass human intelligence and human’s feelings. (704)

References
Fujiko, F. F. (1974). Doraemon. Tokyo: Syougakkann

Gale, A. H. (Producer), & James, C (Director). (1984). The Terminator [Motion


スポンサード リンク



posted by レポートドットコム at 21:57 | Comment(0) | 英語 | このブログの読者になる | 更新情報をチェックする
この記事へのコメント
コメントを書く
お名前:

メールアドレス:

ホームページアドレス:

コメント:

※ブログオーナーが承認したコメントのみ表示されます。
×

この広告は1年以上新しい記事の投稿がないブログに表示されております。